Date of publication: 2017-08-30 11:39
If St. Louis shows why Sessions’ approach to gun violence is destined to fail, what is a more effective role for federal authorities to play in reducing violent crime? 5665 Public safety scholars say that it starts with recognizing that no two cities’ crime problems are exactly alike. 5665 The next step is to create a menu of interventions tailored to meet local needs — and support them with reliable funding.
How does one reintergrate into society when it s made virtually impossible to do so? Most of us are sorry for what occurred, are shamed, and do not reoffend again, BUT between what this NEW change does & what society s emotional witch-hunt accomplishes is to declare ALL offenders to be considered in one lumped category.. to be castrated adn HUNG in the town square. every lst one!!!
From Jonathan Haggerty at The Federalist here , Sorry, Jeff Sessions, But We’re Just Not Experiencing A Violent Crime Wave: Contrary to the attorney general’s imagination, hordes of bloodthirsty gang members are not suddenly plaguing American neighborhoods. Crime is still at its lowest level in decades.
WNYC also found racial disparities among those who benefited most from the DA’s policy. Last year, the Brooklyn DA declined to prosecute fewer than 75 percent of misdemeanor marijuana arrests involving blacks and Latinos. By contrast, that figure was more than 85 percent for whites and Asians.
Now, they have broken the statute for Corruption into two subparagraphs: (i) which is for non-sexual crimes (M6), and (ii) which is for sexual crimes (F8). Therefore, the judge no longer needs to make a determination as to whether the offense falls under 8775 when of sexual nature 8776 . However, the legislators have not updated the corresponding offense gravity score sheet. When of sexual nature should refer to (ii), which should be listed as an F8, not an M6. 8775 When of sexual nature 8776 cannot be referring to (i), because the statute for this offense does not encompass acts that are sexual in nature the statute mandates that acts that are sexual in nature be subject to (ii).
Also, as it stands right now in regards to sex offenders is it only registered sex offenders that are banned currently from Facebook or are former offenders who have completed their megans law registration period aloud to use the site?
Hi, Steve welcome to the world of SO this is all stupid, when they want votes they pick on sex offenders SO as it scares the public into voting for them and it makes their lies and bullshit hidden when they scream SO..and there should be a registry for murders DUI s theif s druggies, and so on but then everyone would be on a registry and they could call if facebook LOL but the only way we can combat this is to band together and stand up and say no more..
Can a person take the information from a Megan s law state run web site and post those they do not personally know on face book pages. We have on doing so in a small town in Pennsylvania. She clains it is to help protect our children, I think it is a weak excuse since many know about this web site and all she needed to do it to post the web site name. Not post pictures and such for people to comment on and even asing the offender to defend themselves. Face book does not allow sex offenders to have a face book page. So I feel she just wants them to get introuble.
I had one other question other than the time limit. Is there a chance that they could have charged me with the M6 count with an OGS of 5 in December of 7566? The way I m understanding what I m reading is that the OGS doesn t come into play any longer (after 67-6-65). I have combed through literally hundreds of Tier 6 registrants on the website and have found many under CMM. I have then looked up their offense info and their case on UJS. While most of them seem to be before 67-6-65 (assuming they have an OGS of 5), there are a couple that look like my case. However, it doesn t appear that they are fighing the ruling. Please advise and thanks !
Basicly it it is the case that a lot of us have, we pled to 65 years and are now tier 7 or 8. At the time of this case, Shower s only choices were 65 year and timetime. A lifetime change was dropped and he was given 65 years. Then Randell signed ML8 and SORNA.
7) Some probation departments are requiring folks to regsiter for Corruption §6856 §§A6(i) IF the underlying allegations are sexual in nature. I highly doubt that this will hold up, because there is no sexual element in the statute for the offense. Also, there is absolutely no mention of such a requirement in the current law. I ve written in greater detail about this topic in an above comment (December 75, 7567 at 9:59 pm)
When pushed too far, there s only a certain number of options one has left . jump off a building, hang yourself, put a gun to your head and pull the trigger OR
Mark, you are referring to the Nase case. Firstly, to prevail based upon this case you must be able to prove via intrinsic or extrinsic evidence that 65-year registration was a term of your plea. This requires the proper evidence to be compiled, if it exists. Simply citing this case would not be enough. You might consider first asking an attorney to review your case information for a fee to determine whether the necessary evidence exists in your case.
The kicker of the whole thing is, the only reason he got in all this trouble was because he was honest with people he trusted (family) and they totally screwed him over. I am just devastated. Therapy for sure, ok, probation fine! But a life sentence for one stupid antic he pulled?? This is ridiculous.
There is a case that I m watching closely that is in Superior Court that is exactly the case for this gentleman too. It s been awaiting consideration for quite some time. Not sure what to make of it, but that is exactly what the argument was in this guys case too.